You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Using workshops to develop theories of change in five low and middle income countries: lessons from the programme for improving mental health care (PRIME)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Journal of Mental Health Systems, April 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1752-4458-8-15 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Erica Breuer, Mary J De Silva, Abebaw Fekadu, Nagendra Prasad Luitel, Vaibhav Murhar, Juliet Nakku, Inge Petersen, Crick Lund |
| Abstract |
The Theory of Change (ToC) approach has been used to develop and evaluate complex health initiatives in a participatory way in high income countries. Little is known about its use to develop mental health care plans in low and middle income countries where mental health services remain inadequate. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| South Africa | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 6 | 86% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 86% |
| Scientists | 1 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 189 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Belgium | 2 | 1% |
| Sierra Leone | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 185 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 40 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 31 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 30 | 16% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 5% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 5% |
| Other | 38 | 20% |
| Unknown | 30 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 48 | 25% |
| Social Sciences | 29 | 15% |
| Psychology | 20 | 11% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 19 | 10% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 5 | 3% |
| Other | 28 | 15% |
| Unknown | 40 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 August 2022.
All research outputs
#6,072,220
of 23,049,027 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Mental Health Systems
#351
of 721 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#57,496
of 227,844 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Mental Health Systems
#9
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,049,027 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 721 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 227,844 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.