↓ Skip to main content

Memory-enhancing activities of the aqueous extract of Albizia adianthifolia leaves in the 6-hydroxydopamine-lesion rodent model of Parkinson’s disease

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies, April 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (51st percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
44 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
74 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Memory-enhancing activities of the aqueous extract of Albizia adianthifolia leaves in the 6-hydroxydopamine-lesion rodent model of Parkinson’s disease
Published in
BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies, April 2014
DOI 10.1186/1472-6882-14-142
Pubmed ID
Authors

Galba Jean Beppe, Alain Bertrand Dongmo, Harquin Simplice Foyet, Nolé Tsabang, Zenovia Olteanu, Oana Cioanca, Monica Hancianu, Théophile Dimo, Lucian Hritcu

Abstract

Albizia adianthifolia (Schumach.) W. Wright (Fabaceae) is a traditional herb largely used in the African traditional medicine as analgesic, purgative, anti-inflammatory, antioxidant, antimicrobial and memory-enhancer drug. This study was undertaken in order to evaluate the possible cognitive-enhancing and antioxidative effects of the aqueous extract of A. adianthifolia leaves in the 6-hydroxydopamine-lesion rodent model of Parkinson's disease.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 74 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Unknown 73 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 14%
Researcher 9 12%
Student > Master 7 9%
Student > Bachelor 6 8%
Other 13 18%
Unknown 18 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 11 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 9%
Neuroscience 6 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 7%
Other 12 16%
Unknown 25 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 March 2016.
All research outputs
#13,175,249
of 22,754,104 outputs
Outputs from BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies
#1,442
of 3,621 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#109,554
of 227,058 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies
#36
of 63 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,754,104 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,621 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 227,058 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 63 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.