↓ Skip to main content

Integration of bioinformatics to biodegradation

Overview of attention for article published in Biological Procedures Online, April 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#31 of 177)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
2 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
57 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
123 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Integration of bioinformatics to biodegradation
Published in
Biological Procedures Online, April 2014
DOI 10.1186/1480-9222-16-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Pankaj Kumar Arora, Hanhong Bae

Abstract

Bioinformatics and biodegradation are two primary scientific fields in applied microbiology and biotechnology. The present review describes development of various bioinformatics tools that may be applied in the field of biodegradation. Several databases, including the University of Minnesota Biocatalysis/Biodegradation database (UM-BBD), a database of biodegradative oxygenases (OxDBase), Biodegradation Network-Molecular Biology Database (Bionemo) MetaCyc, and BioCyc have been developed to enable access to information related to biochemistry and genetics of microbial degradation. In addition, several bioinformatics tools for predicting toxicity and biodegradation of chemicals have been developed. Furthermore, the whole genomes of several potential degrading bacteria have been sequenced and annotated using bioinformatics tools.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 123 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Indonesia 1 <1%
Philippines 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 119 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 30 24%
Researcher 16 13%
Student > Master 11 9%
Student > Bachelor 9 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 6%
Other 23 19%
Unknown 27 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 36 29%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 17 14%
Environmental Science 10 8%
Engineering 6 5%
Chemistry 3 2%
Other 8 7%
Unknown 43 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 July 2023.
All research outputs
#5,078,670
of 24,081,774 outputs
Outputs from Biological Procedures Online
#31
of 177 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#47,943
of 230,729 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biological Procedures Online
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,081,774 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 177 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 230,729 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them