You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Generation of orientation tools for automated zebrafish screening assays using desktop 3D printing
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Biotechnology, May 2014
|
DOI | 10.1186/1472-6750-14-36 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Jonas N Wittbrodt, Urban Liebel, Jochen Gehrig |
Abstract |
The zebrafish has been established as the main vertebrate model system for whole organism screening applications. However, the lack of consistent positioning of zebrafish embryos within wells of microtiter plates remains an obstacle for the comparative analysis of images acquired in automated screening assays. While technical solutions to the orientation problem exist, dissemination is often hindered by the lack of simple and inexpensive ways of distributing and duplicating tools. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Germany | 3 | 23% |
United States | 2 | 15% |
Switzerland | 1 | 8% |
Canada | 1 | 8% |
France | 1 | 8% |
Unknown | 5 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 10 | 77% |
Scientists | 2 | 15% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 119 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Spain | 1 | <1% |
India | 1 | <1% |
United States | 1 | <1% |
Russia | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 115 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 23 | 19% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 20 | 17% |
Student > Master | 19 | 16% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 10 | 8% |
Student > Bachelor | 9 | 8% |
Other | 21 | 18% |
Unknown | 17 | 14% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 29 | 24% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 22 | 18% |
Engineering | 14 | 12% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 8% |
Neuroscience | 5 | 4% |
Other | 21 | 18% |
Unknown | 18 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 25. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 December 2023.
All research outputs
#1,509,858
of 25,177,382 outputs
Outputs from BMC Biotechnology
#22
of 973 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,667
of 234,132 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Biotechnology
#1
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,177,382 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 973 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 234,132 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.