You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Title |
Statistics review 6: Nonparametric methods
|
---|---|
Published in |
Critical Care, September 2002
|
DOI | 10.1186/cc1820 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Elise Whitley, Jonathan Ball |
Abstract |
The present review introduces nonparametric methods. Three of the more common nonparametric methods are described in detail, and the advantages and disadvantages of nonparametric versus parametric methods in general are discussed. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,006 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 18 | 2% |
Brazil | 13 | 1% |
Canada | 7 | <1% |
United Kingdom | 7 | <1% |
India | 6 | <1% |
Denmark | 5 | <1% |
Germany | 4 | <1% |
Belgium | 4 | <1% |
Czechia | 4 | <1% |
Other | 38 | 4% |
Unknown | 900 | 89% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 164 | 16% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 160 | 16% |
Student > Master | 148 | 15% |
Student > Bachelor | 94 | 9% |
Other | 73 | 7% |
Other | 235 | 23% |
Unknown | 132 | 13% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 327 | 33% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 145 | 14% |
Engineering | 57 | 6% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 38 | 4% |
Psychology | 36 | 4% |
Other | 241 | 24% |
Unknown | 162 | 16% |