↓ Skip to main content

Statistics review 6: Nonparametric methods

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Care, September 2002
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
235 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1006 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Statistics review 6: Nonparametric methods
Published in
Critical Care, September 2002
DOI 10.1186/cc1820
Pubmed ID
Authors

Elise Whitley, Jonathan Ball

Abstract

The present review introduces nonparametric methods. Three of the more common nonparametric methods are described in detail, and the advantages and disadvantages of nonparametric versus parametric methods in general are discussed.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,006 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 18 2%
Brazil 13 1%
Canada 7 <1%
United Kingdom 7 <1%
India 6 <1%
Denmark 5 <1%
Germany 4 <1%
Belgium 4 <1%
Czechia 4 <1%
Other 38 4%
Unknown 900 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 164 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 160 16%
Student > Master 148 15%
Student > Bachelor 94 9%
Other 73 7%
Other 235 23%
Unknown 132 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 327 33%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 145 14%
Engineering 57 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 38 4%
Psychology 36 4%
Other 241 24%
Unknown 162 16%