You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Facilitating professional liaison in collaborative care for depression in UK primary care; a qualitative study utilising normalisation process theory
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Primary Care, May 2014
|
DOI | 10.1186/1471-2296-15-78 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Nia Coupe, Emma Anderson, Linda Gask, Paul Sykes, David A Richards, Carolyn Chew-Graham |
Abstract |
Collaborative care (CC) is an organisational framework which facilitates the delivery of a mental health intervention to patients by case managers in collaboration with more senior health professionals (supervisors and GPs), and is effective for the management of depression in primary care. However, there remains limited evidence on how to successfully implement this collaborative approach in UK primary care. This study aimed to explore to what extent CC impacts on professional working relationships, and if CC for depression could be implemented as routine in the primary care setting. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 154 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 2 | 1% |
Brazil | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 151 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 27 | 18% |
Student > Master | 27 | 18% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 26 | 17% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 6% |
Student > Postgraduate | 6 | 4% |
Other | 26 | 17% |
Unknown | 32 | 21% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Psychology | 31 | 20% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 31 | 20% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 25 | 16% |
Social Sciences | 18 | 12% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 4 | 3% |
Other | 13 | 8% |
Unknown | 32 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 May 2014.
All research outputs
#22,759,802
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from BMC Primary Care
#2,212
of 2,359 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#209,803
of 242,176 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Primary Care
#53
of 59 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,359 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 242,176 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 59 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.