↓ Skip to main content

Facilitating professional liaison in collaborative care for depression in UK primary care; a qualitative study utilising normalisation process theory

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Family Practice, May 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
40 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
118 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Facilitating professional liaison in collaborative care for depression in UK primary care; a qualitative study utilising normalisation process theory
Published in
BMC Family Practice, May 2014
DOI 10.1186/1471-2296-15-78
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nia Coupe, Emma Anderson, Linda Gask, Paul Sykes, David A Richards, Carolyn Chew-Graham

Abstract

Collaborative care (CC) is an organisational framework which facilitates the delivery of a mental health intervention to patients by case managers in collaboration with more senior health professionals (supervisors and GPs), and is effective for the management of depression in primary care. However, there remains limited evidence on how to successfully implement this collaborative approach in UK primary care. This study aimed to explore to what extent CC impacts on professional working relationships, and if CC for depression could be implemented as routine in the primary care setting.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 118 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 2%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 115 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 22 19%
Researcher 22 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 19%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 8%
Student > Postgraduate 5 4%
Other 21 18%
Unknown 16 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 29 25%
Psychology 27 23%
Social Sciences 17 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 17 14%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 2%
Other 10 8%
Unknown 16 14%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 May 2014.
All research outputs
#10,995,952
of 12,373,620 outputs
Outputs from BMC Family Practice
#1,128
of 1,233 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#160,941
of 193,326 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Family Practice
#22
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,373,620 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,233 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 193,326 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.