↓ Skip to main content

Learning needs analysis to guide teaching evidence-based medicine: knowledge and beliefs amongst trainees from various specialities

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Education, May 2007
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
51 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
111 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Learning needs analysis to guide teaching evidence-based medicine: knowledge and beliefs amongst trainees from various specialities
Published in
BMC Medical Education, May 2007
DOI 10.1186/1472-6920-7-11
Pubmed ID
Authors

Julie A Hadley, David Wall, Khalid S Khan

Abstract

We undertook a needs assessment exercise using questionnaire survey of junior doctors' knowledge and beliefs concerning evidence-based medicine (EBM) and critical literature appraisal, as this is a core competence in postgraduate medical education.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 111 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 2%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Saudi Arabia 1 <1%
Oman 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 104 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 15 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 13%
Student > Postgraduate 12 11%
Researcher 8 7%
Other 7 6%
Other 38 34%
Unknown 17 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 51 46%
Social Sciences 10 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 7%
Computer Science 4 4%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 3%
Other 14 13%
Unknown 21 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 July 2007.
All research outputs
#15,233,109
of 22,649,029 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Education
#2,252
of 3,290 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#62,085
of 71,873 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Education
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,649,029 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,290 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 71,873 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them