You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Drought resistance of Pinus sylvestris seedlings conferred by plastic root architecture rather than ectomycorrhizal colonisation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Annals of Forest Science , May 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s13595-014-0380-6 |
| Authors |
Barbara Moser, Tabea Kipfer, Sarah Richter, Simon Egli, Thomas Wohlgemuth |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 2 | 40% |
| Belgium | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 2 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 2 | 40% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 40% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 51 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 4% |
| Denmark | 1 | 2% |
| South Africa | 1 | 2% |
| Brazil | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 46 | 90% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 25% |
| Researcher | 12 | 24% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 5 | 10% |
| Unknown | 9 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 20 | 39% |
| Environmental Science | 16 | 31% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 4% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 2 | 4% |
| Unknown | 11 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 May 2014.
All research outputs
#14,914,476
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Forest Science
#801
of 942 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#121,066
of 242,177 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Forest Science
#3
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 942 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 242,177 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.