You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Exhaled breath profiling for diagnosing acute respiratory distress syndrome
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Pulmonary Medicine, April 2014
|
DOI | 10.1186/1471-2466-14-72 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Lieuwe DJ Bos, Marcus J Schultz, Peter J Sterk |
Abstract |
The acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is a common, devastating complication of critical illness that is characterized by pulmonary injury and inflammation. The clinical diagnosis may be improved by means of objective biological markers. Electronic nose (eNose) technology can rapidly and non-invasively provide breath prints, which are profiles of volatile metabolites in the exhaled breath. We hypothesized that breath prints could facilitate accurate diagnosis of ARDS in intubated and ventilated intensive care unit (ICU) patients. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 50% |
Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Scientists | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 87 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 87 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 16 | 18% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 16% |
Student > Postgraduate | 7 | 8% |
Student > Bachelor | 7 | 8% |
Student > Master | 7 | 8% |
Other | 19 | 22% |
Unknown | 17 | 20% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 31 | 36% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 7% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 5% |
Engineering | 4 | 5% |
Physics and Astronomy | 3 | 3% |
Other | 12 | 14% |
Unknown | 27 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 March 2022.
All research outputs
#4,313,849
of 23,400,864 outputs
Outputs from BMC Pulmonary Medicine
#315
of 1,975 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,990
of 228,317 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Pulmonary Medicine
#3
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,400,864 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,975 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 228,317 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.