↓ Skip to main content

Factors predictive of treatment failure in staphylococcal prosthetic vascular graft infections: a prospective observational cohort study: impact of rifampin

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Infectious Diseases, April 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
62 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Factors predictive of treatment failure in staphylococcal prosthetic vascular graft infections: a prospective observational cohort study: impact of rifampin
Published in
BMC Infectious Diseases, April 2014
DOI 10.1186/1471-2334-14-228
Pubmed ID
Authors

Laurence Legout, Piervito Delia, Béatrice Sarraz-Bournet, Cécile Rouyer, Massongo Massongo, Michel Valette, Olivier Leroy, Stephan Haulon, Eric Senneville

Abstract

There exists considerable debate concerning management of prosthetic vascular graft infection (PVGI), especially in terms of antimicrobial treatment. This report studies factors associated with treatment failure in a cohort of patients with staphylococcal PVGI, along with the impact of rifampin (RIF).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 62 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 2%
Unknown 61 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 9 15%
Student > Bachelor 8 13%
Researcher 4 6%
Student > Postgraduate 4 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 6%
Other 15 24%
Unknown 18 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 25 40%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 10%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Linguistics 1 2%
Other 5 8%
Unknown 21 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 August 2022.
All research outputs
#16,849,988
of 25,559,053 outputs
Outputs from BMC Infectious Diseases
#4,760
of 8,653 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#140,706
of 242,394 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Infectious Diseases
#93
of 157 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,559,053 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,653 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.7. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 242,394 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 157 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.