You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Introducing rapid oral–fluid HIV testing among high risk populations in Shandong, China: feasibility and challenges
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Public Health, May 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2458-14-422 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Gifty Marley, Dianmin Kang, Erin C Wilson, Tao Huang, Yuesheng Qian, Xiufang Li, Xiaorun Tao, Guoyong Wang, Huanmiao Xun, Wei Ma |
| Abstract |
This study was conducted to ascertain the feasibility of using rapid oral fluid testing as an alternative HIV testing method in China. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 33% |
| Canada | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 101 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| India | 2 | 2% |
| Tanzania, United Republic of | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 98 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 21 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 21 | 21% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 19% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 5% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 13 | 13% |
| Unknown | 18 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 21 | 21% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 20 | 20% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 12 | 12% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 7% |
| Psychology | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 13 | 13% |
| Unknown | 22 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 October 2014.
All research outputs
#14,195,754
of 22,755,127 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#10,310
of 14,829 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#120,536
of 227,522 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#201
of 283 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,755,127 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,829 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 227,522 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 283 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.