↓ Skip to main content

Systemic glucose variability predicts cerebral metabolic distress and mortality after subarachnoid hemorrhage: a retrospective observational study

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Care, May 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
56 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
65 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Systemic glucose variability predicts cerebral metabolic distress and mortality after subarachnoid hemorrhage: a retrospective observational study
Published in
Critical Care, May 2014
DOI 10.1186/cc13857
Pubmed ID
Authors

Pedro Kurtz, Jan Claassen, Raimund Helbok, J Michael Schmidt, Luis Fernandez, Mary Presciutti, R Morgan Stuart, E Sander Connolly, Kiwon Lee, Neeraj Badjatia, Stephan A Mayer

Abstract

Cerebral glucose metabolism and energy production are affected by serum glucose levels. Systemic glucose variability has been shown to be associated with poor outcome in critically ill patients. The objective of this study was to assess whether glucose variability is associated with cerebral metabolic distress and outcome after subarachnoid hemorrhage.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 65 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 1 2%
India 1 2%
Belgium 1 2%
Romania 1 2%
United States 1 2%
Unknown 60 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 17%
Student > Postgraduate 8 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 11%
Professor 6 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 9%
Other 16 25%
Unknown 11 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 38 58%
Neuroscience 3 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 3%
Chemistry 2 3%
Social Sciences 1 2%
Other 2 3%
Unknown 17 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 November 2014.
All research outputs
#7,960,512
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#4,225
of 6,554 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#72,679
of 242,113 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#77
of 132 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,554 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 242,113 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 132 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.