You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
High dose tigecycline in critically ill patients with severe infections due to multidrug-resistant bacteria
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Care, May 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/cc13858 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Gennaro De Pascale, Luca Montini, Mariano Alberto Pennisi, Valentina Bernini, Riccardo Maviglia, Giuseppe Bello, Teresa Spanu, Mario Tumbarello, Massimo Antonelli |
| Abstract |
The high incidence of multidrug-resistant (MDR) bacteria among patients admitted to ICUs has determined an increase of tigecycline (TGC) use for the treatment of severe infections. Many concerns have been raised about the efficacy of this molecule and increased dosages have been proposed. Our purpose is to investigate TGC safety and efficacy at higher than standard doses. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 13% |
| Spain | 2 | 13% |
| India | 1 | 7% |
| Mexico | 1 | 7% |
| United States | 1 | 7% |
| Canada | 1 | 7% |
| Saudi Arabia | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 6 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 8 | 53% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 27% |
| Scientists | 2 | 13% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 151 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Russia | 1 | <1% |
| Greece | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 145 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 21 | 14% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 18 | 12% |
| Researcher | 17 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 7% |
| Other | 36 | 24% |
| Unknown | 34 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 64 | 42% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 25 | 17% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 5 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 5 | 3% |
| Unknown | 43 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 June 2023.
All research outputs
#4,180,933
of 25,728,855 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#2,956
of 6,613 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,868
of 242,710 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#37
of 135 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,728,855 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,613 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 242,710 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 135 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.