↓ Skip to main content

Echocardiographic assessment of pulmonary artery occlusion pressure in ventilated patients: a transoesophageal study

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Care, February 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (64th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Readers on

mendeley
68 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Echocardiographic assessment of pulmonary artery occlusion pressure in ventilated patients: a transoesophageal study
Published in
Critical Care, February 2008
DOI 10.1186/cc6792
Pubmed ID
Authors

Philippe Vignon, Ali AitHssain, Bruno François, Pierre-Marie Preux, Nicolas Pichon, Marc Clavel, Jean-Pierre Frat, Hervé Gastinne

Abstract

Non-invasive evaluation of left ventricular filling pressure has been scarcely studied in critically ill patients. Accordingly, we prospectively assessed the ability of transoesophageal echocardiography (TEE) Doppler to predict an invasive pulmonary artery occlusion pressure (PAOP) < or = 18 mmHg in ventilated patients.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 68 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 3 4%
Indonesia 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Egypt 1 1%
Unknown 62 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 12 18%
Researcher 11 16%
Student > Postgraduate 9 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 9%
Other 10 15%
Unknown 14 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 46 68%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 1%
Computer Science 1 1%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 1%
Other 2 3%
Unknown 14 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 August 2019.
All research outputs
#8,474,955
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#4,376
of 6,554 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,065
of 96,289 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#15
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,554 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 96,289 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.