You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Patients’ experiences of lifestyle discussions based on motivational interviewing: a qualitative study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Nursing, May 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1472-6955-13-13 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Elisabeth Brobeck, Sigrid Odencrants, Håkan Bergh, Cathrine Hildingh |
| Abstract |
According to World Health Organization about 75% of cardiovascular diseases and type 2 diabetes and 40% of all cases of cancer could be prevented if the risk factors tobacco use, unhealthy diets, physical inactivity and harmful use of alcohol could be eliminated. Patients often need help in monitoring themselves to make the proper lifestyle changes and it is important that adequate support is provided to enable the patients to take control over their health. Motivational interviewing is a framework that can help to facilitate this movement. The aim of this study was to describe how patients in primary health care settings experience lifestyle discussions based on motivational interviewing. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | 20% |
| United States | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 3 | 60% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 60% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 40% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 86 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 2% |
| Switzerland | 2 | 2% |
| Unknown | 82 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 16 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 13 | 15% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 10% |
| Librarian | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 14 | 16% |
| Unknown | 20 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 24 | 28% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 17 | 20% |
| Social Sciences | 6 | 7% |
| Psychology | 5 | 6% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 10 | 12% |
| Unknown | 21 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 May 2014.
All research outputs
#13,859,387
of 23,881,329 outputs
Outputs from BMC Nursing
#339
of 801 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#112,319
of 229,794 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Nursing
#5
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,881,329 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 801 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 229,794 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.