↓ Skip to main content

Repositioning: the fast track to new anti-malarial medicines?

Overview of attention for article published in Malaria Journal, April 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 tweeters
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
34 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
77 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Repositioning: the fast track to new anti-malarial medicines?
Published in
Malaria Journal, April 2014
DOI 10.1186/1475-2875-13-143
Pubmed ID
Authors

Julie Lotharius, Francisco Javier Gamo-Benito, Iñigo Angulo-Barturen, Julie Clark, Michele Connelly, Santiago Ferrer-Bazaga, Tanya Parkinson, Pavithra Viswanath, Balachandra Bandodkar, Nikhil Rautela, Sowmya Bharath, Sandra Duffy, Vicky M Avery, Jörg J Möhrle, R Kiplin Guy, Timothy Wells

Abstract

Repositioning of existing drugs has been suggested as a fast track for developing new anti-malarial agents. The compound libraries of GlaxoSmithKline (GSK), Pfizer and AstraZeneca (AZ) comprising drugs that have undergone clinical studies in other therapeutic areas, but not achieved approval, and a set of US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved drugs and other bio-actives were tested against Plasmodium falciparum blood stages.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 77 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 3%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Uganda 1 1%
Unknown 73 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 15 19%
Researcher 14 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 17%
Student > Bachelor 6 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 6%
Other 11 14%
Unknown 13 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 15 19%
Chemistry 12 16%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 10%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 7 9%
Other 11 14%
Unknown 16 21%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 May 2014.
All research outputs
#4,696,932
of 15,922,988 outputs
Outputs from Malaria Journal
#1,601
of 4,496 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#53,711
of 192,178 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Malaria Journal
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,922,988 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,496 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 192,178 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them