↓ Skip to main content

Genomic innovations, transcriptional plasticity and gene loss underlying the evolution and divergence of two highly polyphagous and invasive Helicoverpa pest species

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Biology, July 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
19 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
253 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
194 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Genomic innovations, transcriptional plasticity and gene loss underlying the evolution and divergence of two highly polyphagous and invasive Helicoverpa pest species
Published in
BMC Biology, July 2017
DOI 10.1186/s12915-017-0402-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

S. L. Pearce, D. F. Clarke, P. D. East, S. Elfekih, K. H. J. Gordon, L. S. Jermiin, A. McGaughran, J. G. Oakeshott, A. Papanikolaou, O. P. Perera, R. V. Rane, S. Richards, W. T. Tay, T. K. Walsh, A. Anderson, C. J. Anderson, S. Asgari, P. G. Board, A. Bretschneider, P. M. Campbell, T. Chertemps, J. T. Christeller, C. W. Coppin, S. J. Downes, G. Duan, C. A. Farnsworth, R. T. Good, L. B. Han, Y. C. Han, K. Hatje, I. Horne, Y. P Huang, D. S. T. Hughes, E. Jacquin-Joly, W. James, S. Jhangiani, M. Kollmar, S. S. Kuwar, S. Li, N-Y. Liu, M. T. Maibeche, J. R. Miller, N. Montagne, T. Perry, J. Qu, S. V. Song, G. G. Sutton, H. Vogel, B. P. Walenz, W. Xu, H-J. Zhang, Z. Zou, P. Batterham, O. R. Edwards, R. Feyereisen, R. A. Gibbs, D. G. Heckel, A. McGrath, C. Robin, S. E. Scherer, K. C. Worley, Y. D. Wu

Abstract

Helicoverpa armigera and Helicoverpa zea are major caterpillar pests of Old and New World agriculture, respectively. Both, particularly H. armigera, are extremely polyphagous, and H. armigera has developed resistance to many insecticides. Here we use comparative genomics, transcriptomics and resequencing to elucidate the genetic basis for their properties as pests. We find that, prior to their divergence about 1.5 Mya, the H. armigera/H. zea lineage had accumulated up to more than 100 more members of specific detoxification and digestion gene families and more than 100 extra gustatory receptor genes, compared to other lepidopterans with narrower host ranges. The two genomes remain very similar in gene content and order, but H. armigera is more polymorphic overall, and H. zea has lost several detoxification genes, as well as about 50 gustatory receptor genes. It also lacks certain genes and alleles conferring insecticide resistance found in H. armigera. Non-synonymous sites in the expanded gene families above are rapidly diverging, both between paralogues and between orthologues in the two species. Whole genome transcriptomic analyses of H. armigera larvae show widely divergent responses to different host plants, including responses among many of the duplicated detoxification and digestion genes. The extreme polyphagy of the two heliothines is associated with extensive amplification and neofunctionalisation of genes involved in host finding and use, coupled with versatile transcriptional responses on different hosts. H. armigera's invasion of the Americas in recent years means that hybridisation could generate populations that are both locally adapted and insecticide resistant.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 194 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 194 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 33 17%
Researcher 29 15%
Student > Master 22 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 6%
Professor 10 5%
Other 34 18%
Unknown 54 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 84 43%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 27 14%
Environmental Science 8 4%
Chemistry 2 1%
Social Sciences 2 1%
Other 6 3%
Unknown 65 34%