↓ Skip to main content

A ddRAD-based genetic map and its integration with the genome assembly of Japanese eel (Anguilla japonica) provides insights into genome evolution after the teleost-specific genome duplication

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Genomics, March 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
peer_reviews
1 peer review site

Readers on

mendeley
184 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A ddRAD-based genetic map and its integration with the genome assembly of Japanese eel (Anguilla japonica) provides insights into genome evolution after the teleost-specific genome duplication
Published in
BMC Genomics, March 2014
DOI 10.1186/1471-2164-15-233
Pubmed ID
Authors

Wataru Kai, Kazuharu Nomura, Atushi Fujiwara, Yoji Nakamura, Motoshige Yasuike, Nobuhiko Ojima, Tetsuji Masaoka, Akiyuki Ozaki, Yukinori Kazeto, Koichiro Gen, Jiro Nagao, Hideki Tanaka, Takanori Kobayashi, Mitsuru Ototake

Abstract

Recent advancements in next-generation sequencing technology have enabled cost-effective sequencing of whole or partial genomes, permitting the discovery and characterization of molecular polymorphisms. Double-digest restriction-site associated DNA sequencing (ddRAD-seq) is a powerful and inexpensive approach to developing numerous single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) markers and constructing a high-density genetic map. To enrich genomic resources for Japanese eel (Anguilla japonica), we constructed a ddRAD-based genetic map using an Ion Torrent Personal Genome Machine and anchored scaffolds of the current genome assembly to 19 linkage groups of the Japanese eel. Furthermore, we compared the Japanese eel genome with genomes of model fishes to infer the history of genome evolution after the teleost-specific genome duplication.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 184 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Sweden 2 1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 176 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 49 27%
Researcher 40 22%
Student > Master 25 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 8%
Student > Bachelor 12 7%
Other 25 14%
Unknown 19 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 116 63%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 27 15%
Environmental Science 6 3%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 2%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 2 1%
Other 3 2%
Unknown 26 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 December 2014.
All research outputs
#14,780,519
of 22,755,127 outputs
Outputs from BMC Genomics
#6,124
of 10,637 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#126,423
of 224,571 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Genomics
#78
of 158 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,755,127 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,637 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 224,571 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 158 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.