↓ Skip to main content

Unexpected random urinary protein:creatinine ratio results–limitations of the pyrocatechol violet-dye method

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, July 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
41 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Unexpected random urinary protein:creatinine ratio results–limitations of the pyrocatechol violet-dye method
Published in
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, July 2013
DOI 10.1186/1471-2393-13-152
Pubmed ID
Authors

Dane A De Silva, Anne C Halstead, Anne-Marie Côté, Yasser Sabr, Peter von Dadelszen, Laura A Magee

Abstract

For clinicians, it is important to rely on accurate laboratory results for patient care and optimal use of health care resources. We sought to explore our observations that urine protein:creatinine ratios (PrCr) >=30 mg/mmol are seen not infrequently associated with normal pregnancy outcome.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 41 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 6 15%
Researcher 5 12%
Professor 4 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 7%
Other 2 5%
Other 4 10%
Unknown 17 41%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 16 39%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Social Sciences 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 18 44%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 May 2014.
All research outputs
#15,300,431
of 22,755,127 outputs
Outputs from BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
#2,983
of 4,175 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#106,192
of 172,169 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
#28
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,755,127 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,175 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.8. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 172,169 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.