↓ Skip to main content

Implementing tobacco dependence treatment during clinical consultations: a qualitative study of clinicians’ experiences, perceptions and behaviours in a South African primary health care setting

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Family Practice, May 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
64 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Implementing tobacco dependence treatment during clinical consultations: a qualitative study of clinicians’ experiences, perceptions and behaviours in a South African primary health care setting
Published in
BMC Family Practice, May 2014
DOI 10.1186/1471-2296-15-85
Pubmed ID
Authors

Olufemi B Omole, Olalekan A Ayo-Yusuf, Kabilabe NW Ngobale

Abstract

Evidence suggests that healthcare providers (HCPs) in South Africa do not consistently offer tobacco dependence treatment (TDT) during clinical consultations. In order to understand and explain this behaviour in a South African context, we conducted a qualitative exploration of HCPs' experiences, perceptions and behaviours regarding TDT.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 64 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Unknown 63 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 15 23%
Researcher 8 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 8%
Student > Bachelor 3 5%
Other 11 17%
Unknown 14 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 17 27%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 19%
Social Sciences 8 13%
Psychology 3 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 3%
Other 7 11%
Unknown 15 23%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 May 2014.
All research outputs
#2,981,354
of 3,724,409 outputs
Outputs from BMC Family Practice
#540
of 652 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#75,975
of 95,440 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Family Practice
#57
of 69 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 3,724,409 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 652 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 95,440 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 69 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.