↓ Skip to main content

An overview of forensic drug testing methods and their suitability for harm reduction point-of-care services

Overview of attention for article published in Harm Reduction Journal, July 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
8 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
40 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
238 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
589 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
An overview of forensic drug testing methods and their suitability for harm reduction point-of-care services
Published in
Harm Reduction Journal, July 2017
DOI 10.1186/s12954-017-0179-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lane Harper, Jeff Powell, Em M. Pijl

Abstract

Given the current opioid crisis around the world, harm reduction agencies are seeking to help people who use drugs to do so more safely. Many harm reduction agencies are exploring techniques to test illicit drugs to identify and, where possible, quantify their constituents allowing their users to make informed decisions. While these technologies have been used for years in Europe (Nightlife Empowerment & Well-being Implementation Project, Drug Checking Service: Good Practice Standards; Trans European Drugs Information (TEDI) Workgroup, Factsheet on Drug Checking in Europe, 2011; European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction, An Inventory of On-site Pill-Testing Interventions in the EU: Fact Files, 2001), they are only now starting to be utilized in this context in North America. The goal of this paper is to describe the most common methods for testing illicit substances and then, based on this broad, encompassing review, recommend the most appropriate methods for testing at point of care.Based on our review, the best methods for point-of-care drug testing are handheld infrared spectroscopy, Raman spectroscopy, and ion mobility spectrometry; mass spectrometry is the current gold standard in forensic drug analysis. It would be prudent for agencies or clinics that can obtain the funding to contact the companies who produce these devices to discuss possible usage in a harm reduction setting. Lower tech options, such as spot/color tests and immunoassays, are limited in their use but affordable and easy to use.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 40 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 589 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 589 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 123 21%
Student > Master 67 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 50 8%
Researcher 43 7%
Other 20 3%
Other 66 11%
Unknown 220 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 122 21%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 35 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 28 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 26 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 26 4%
Other 104 18%
Unknown 248 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 104. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 January 2023.
All research outputs
#403,239
of 25,363,685 outputs
Outputs from Harm Reduction Journal
#69
of 1,118 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,595
of 326,772 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Harm Reduction Journal
#6
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,363,685 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,118 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 28.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 326,772 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.