You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Role of fibroblast growth factors in bone regeneration
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Inflammation and Regeneration, August 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s41232-017-0043-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Pornkawee Charoenlarp, Arun Kumar Rajendran, Sachiko Iseki |
| Abstract |
Bone is a metabolically active organ that undergoes continuous remodeling throughout life. However, many complex skeletal defects such as large traumatic bone defects or extensive bone loss after tumor resection may cause failure of bone healing. Effective therapies for these conditions typically employ combinations of cells, scaffolds, and bioactive factors. In this review, we pay attention to one of the three factors required for regeneration of bone, bioactive factors, especially the fibroblast growth factor (FGF) family. This family is composed of 22 members and associated with various biological functions including skeletal formation. Based on the phenotypes of genetically modified mice and spatio-temporal expression levels during bone fracture healing, FGF2, FGF9, and FGF18 are regarded as possible candidates useful for bone regeneration. The role of these candidate FGFs in bone regeneration is also discussed in this review. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 50% |
| Canada | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 50% |
| Scientists | 1 | 25% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 132 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 132 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 18 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 12 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 9 | 7% |
| Other | 16 | 12% |
| Unknown | 47 | 36% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 24 | 18% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 22 | 17% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 5% |
| Materials Science | 7 | 5% |
| Engineering | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 13 | 10% |
| Unknown | 53 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 July 2022.
All research outputs
#6,755,994
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Inflammation and Regeneration
#69
of 258 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#98,598
of 327,503 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Inflammation and Regeneration
#1
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 258 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 327,503 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them