↓ Skip to main content

Clinical experience with ipilimumab 3 mg/kg: real-world efficacy and safety data from an expanded access programme cohort

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Translational Medicine, May 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
150 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
84 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Clinical experience with ipilimumab 3 mg/kg: real-world efficacy and safety data from an expanded access programme cohort
Published in
Journal of Translational Medicine, May 2014
DOI 10.1186/1479-5876-12-116
Pubmed ID
Authors

Paolo A Ascierto, Ester Simeone, Vanna Chiarion Sileni, Jacopo Pigozzo, Michele Maio, Maresa Altomonte, Michele Del Vecchio, Lorenza Di Guardo, Paolo Marchetti, Ruggero Ridolfi, Francesco Cognetti, Alessandro Testori, Maria Grazia Bernengo, Michele Guida, Riccardo Marconcini, Mario Mandalà, Carolina Cimminiello, Gaetana Rinaldi, Massimo Aglietta, Paola Queirolo

Abstract

Ipilimumab improves survival in patients with advanced melanoma. The activity and safety of ipilimumab outside of a clinical trial was assessed in an expanded access programme (EAP).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 84 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 84 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 13 15%
Other 11 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 10%
Student > Bachelor 8 10%
Student > Master 8 10%
Other 17 20%
Unknown 19 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 32 38%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 10%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 2%
Other 8 10%
Unknown 22 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 August 2015.
All research outputs
#3,561,561
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Translational Medicine
#631
of 4,635 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,372
of 241,929 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Translational Medicine
#12
of 99 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,635 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 241,929 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 99 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.