↓ Skip to main content

Policy approaches to improve availability and affordability of medicines in Mexico – an example of a middle income country

Overview of attention for article published in Globalization and Health, August 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
101 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Policy approaches to improve availability and affordability of medicines in Mexico – an example of a middle income country
Published in
Globalization and Health, August 2017
DOI 10.1186/s12992-017-0281-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Daniela Moye-Holz, Jitse P van Dijk, Sijmen A. Reijneveld, Hans V. Hogerzeil

Abstract

The World Health Organization recommends establishing and implementing a national pharmaceutical policy (NPP) to guarantee effective and equitable access to medicines. Mexico has implemented several policy approaches to regulate the pharmaceutical sector, but it has no formal NPP. This article describes the approach that the Mexican government has taken to improve availability and affordability of essential medicines. Descriptive policy analysis of public pharmaceutical policy proposals and health action plans on the basis of publicly available data and health progress reports, with a focus on availability and affordability of medicines. The government has implemented pooled procurement, price negotiations, and an information platform in the public sector to improve affordability and availability. The government mainly reports on the savings that these strategies have generated in the public expenditure but their full impact on availability and affordability has not been assessed. To increase availability and affordability of medicines in the public sector, the Mexican government has resorted on isolated strategies. In addition to efficient procurement, price negotiations and price information, other policy components and pricing interventions are needed. All these strategies should be included in a comprehensive NPP.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 101 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 101 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 29 29%
Researcher 9 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 8%
Student > Bachelor 8 8%
Professor 6 6%
Other 15 15%
Unknown 26 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 18 18%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 15 15%
Social Sciences 11 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 10%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 5 5%
Other 14 14%
Unknown 28 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 April 2019.
All research outputs
#13,400,599
of 23,323,574 outputs
Outputs from Globalization and Health
#884
of 1,121 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#154,660
of 318,219 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Globalization and Health
#31
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,323,574 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,121 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.1. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 318,219 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.