You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Evidence maps and evidence gaps: evidence review mapping as a method for collating and appraising evidence reviews to inform research and policy
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Environmental Evidence, July 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13750-017-0096-9 |
| Authors |
Bethan C. O’Leary, Paul Woodcock, Michel J. Kaiser, Andrew S. Pullin |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 34 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 13 | 38% |
| Australia | 3 | 9% |
| Sweden | 3 | 9% |
| South Africa | 2 | 6% |
| Chile | 1 | 3% |
| United States | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 11 | 32% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 21 | 62% |
| Scientists | 10 | 29% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 6% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 81 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 81 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 15 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 12% |
| Other | 7 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 7% |
| Other | 15 | 19% |
| Unknown | 16 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 13 | 16% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 11% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 10% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 7% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 18 | 22% |
| Unknown | 22 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 May 2018.
All research outputs
#1,718,683
of 23,509,982 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Evidence
#73
of 306 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,344
of 284,365 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Evidence
#3
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,509,982 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 306 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 284,365 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.