↓ Skip to main content

Genomic regions involved in yield potential detected by genome-wide association analysis in Japanese high-yielding rice cultivars

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Genomics, May 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
28 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
71 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Genomic regions involved in yield potential detected by genome-wide association analysis in Japanese high-yielding rice cultivars
Published in
BMC Genomics, May 2014
DOI 10.1186/1471-2164-15-346
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jun-ichi Yonemaru, Ritsuko Mizobuchi, Hiroshi Kato, Toshio Yamamoto, Eiji Yamamoto, Kazuki Matsubara, Hideyuki Hirabayashi, Yoshinobu Takeuchi, Hiroshi Tsunematsu, Takuro Ishii, Hisatoshi Ohta, Hideo Maeda, Kaworu Ebana, Masahiro Yano

Abstract

High-yielding cultivars of rice (Oryza sativa L.) have been developed in Japan from crosses between overseas indica and domestic japonica cultivars. Recently, next-generation sequencing technology and high-throughput genotyping systems have shown many single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) that are proving useful for detailed analysis of genome composition. These SNPs can be used in genome-wide association studies to detect candidate genome regions associated with economically important traits. In this study, we used a custom SNP set to identify introgressed chromosomal regions in a set of high-yielding Japanese rice cultivars, and we performed an association study to identify genome regions associated with yield.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 71 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Malaysia 1 1%
Netherlands 1 1%
Sri Lanka 1 1%
China 1 1%
Japan 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Unknown 65 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 22 31%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 21%
Student > Master 11 15%
Student > Bachelor 4 6%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 4%
Other 7 10%
Unknown 9 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 44 62%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 14%
Computer Science 4 6%
Environmental Science 1 1%
Neuroscience 1 1%
Other 1 1%
Unknown 10 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 May 2014.
All research outputs
#7,848,328
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from BMC Genomics
#3,416
of 11,244 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#71,797
of 242,096 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Genomics
#72
of 259 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,244 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 242,096 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 259 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.