↓ Skip to main content

Creation of a core outcome set for clinical trials of people with shoulder pain: a study protocol

Overview of attention for article published in Trials, July 2017
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
101 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Creation of a core outcome set for clinical trials of people with shoulder pain: a study protocol
Published in
Trials, July 2017
DOI 10.1186/s13063-017-2054-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Joel J. Gagnier, Matthew J. Page, Hsiaomin Huang, Arianne P. Verhagen, Rachelle Buchbinder

Abstract

The selection of appropriate outcomes or domains is crucial when designing clinical trials, to appreciate the effects of different interventions, pool results, and make valid comparisons between trials. If the findings are to influence policy and practice, then the chosen outcomes need to be relevant and important to key stakeholders, including patients and the public, healthcare professionals and others making decisions about health care. There is a growing recognition that insufficient attention has been paid to the outcomes measured in clinical trials. Recent reviews of the measurement properties of patient-reported outcome measures for shoulder disorders revealed a large selection of diverse measures, many with questionable validity, reliability, and responsiveness. These issues could be addressed through the development and use of an agreed standardized collection of outcomes, known as a core outcome set (COS), which should be measured and reported in all trials of shoulder disorders. The purpose of the present project is to develop and disseminate a COS for clinical trials in shoulder disorders. The methods for the COS development will include 3 phases: (1) a comprehensive review of the core domains used in shoulder disorder trials; (2) an international Delphi study involving relevant stakeholders (patients, clinicians, scientists) to define which domains should be core; and (3) an international focus group informed by the evidence identified in phases 1 and 2, to determine which measurement instruments best measure the core domains and identification of any evidence gaps that require further empiric evidence. The aim of the current proposal is to convene several meetings of international experts and patients to develop a COS for clinical trials of shoulder disorders and to develop an implementation strategy to ensure rapid uptake of the core set of outcomes in clinical trials. There would be an expectation that the core set of outcomes would always be collected and reported, but it would not preclude use of additional outcomes in a particular trial.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 101 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 101 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 12 12%
Researcher 11 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 10%
Student > Master 9 9%
Other 6 6%
Other 23 23%
Unknown 30 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 37 37%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 12%
Social Sciences 5 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 2%
Sports and Recreations 2 2%
Other 6 6%
Unknown 37 37%