↓ Skip to main content

Genome-wide microRNA expression profiling in placentae from frozen-thawed blastocyst transfer

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Epigenetics, August 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
55 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
90 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Genome-wide microRNA expression profiling in placentae from frozen-thawed blastocyst transfer
Published in
Clinical Epigenetics, August 2017
DOI 10.1186/s13148-017-0379-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hitoshi Hiura, Hiromitsu Hattori, Norio Kobayashi, Hiroaki Okae, Hatsune Chiba, Naoko Miyauchi, Akane Kitamura, Hiroyuki Kikuchi, Hiroaki Yoshida, Takahiro Arima

Abstract

Frozen-thawed embryo transfer (FET) is increasingly available for the improvement of the success rate of assisted reproductive technologies other than fresh embryo transfer (ET). There have been numerous findings that FET provides better obstetric and perinatal outcomes. However, the birth weight of infants conceived using FET is heavier than that of those conceived via ET. In addition, some reports have suggested that FET is associated with perinatal diseases such as placenta accreta and pregnancy-induced hypertension (PIH). In this study, we compared the microRNA (miRNA) expression profiles in term placentae derived from FET, ET, and spontaneous pregnancy (SP). We identified four miRNAs, miR-130a-3p, miR-149-5p, miR-423-5p, and miR-487b-3p, that were significantly downregulated in FET placentae compared with those from SP and ET. We found that DNA methylation of MEG3-DMR, not but IG-DMR, was associated with miRNA expression of the DLK1-DIO3 imprinted domain in the human placenta. In functional analyses, GO terms and signaling pathways related to positive regulation of gene expression, growth, development, cell migration, and type II diabetes mellitus (T2DM) were enriched. This study supports the hypothesis that the process of FET may increase exposure of epigenome to external influences.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 90 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 90 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 20%
Researcher 12 13%
Student > Master 9 10%
Student > Bachelor 9 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 4%
Other 10 11%
Unknown 28 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 19 21%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 18 20%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 4%
Chemistry 3 3%
Other 10 11%
Unknown 30 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 April 2018.
All research outputs
#18,566,650
of 22,996,001 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Epigenetics
#1,005
of 1,262 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#243,209
of 317,591 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Epigenetics
#20
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,996,001 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,262 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 317,591 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.