↓ Skip to main content

Epstein–Barr virus and rheumatoid arthritis: is there a link?

Overview of attention for article published in Arthritis Research & Therapy, January 2006
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
2 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
84 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
97 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Epstein–Barr virus and rheumatoid arthritis: is there a link?
Published in
Arthritis Research & Therapy, January 2006
DOI 10.1186/ar1893
Pubmed ID
Authors

Karen H Costenbader, Elizabeth W Karlson

Abstract

Rheumatoid arthritis is a systemic autoimmune disease characterized by chronic, destructive, debilitating arthritis. Its etiology is unknown; it is presumed that environmental factors trigger development in the genetically predisposed. Epstein-Barr virus, a nearly ubiquitous virus in the human population, has generated great interest as a potential trigger. This virus stimulates polyclonal lymphocyte expansion and persists within B lymphocytes for the host's life, inhibited from reactivating by the immune response. In latent and replicating forms, it has immunomodulating actions that could play a role in the development of this autoimmune disease. The evidence linking Epstein-Barr virus and rheumatoid arthritis is reviewed.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 97 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 3 3%
Ireland 1 1%
Sweden 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Japan 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Unknown 89 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 22 23%
Researcher 15 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 14%
Student > Master 10 10%
Other 6 6%
Other 15 15%
Unknown 15 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 37 38%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 19 20%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 13%
Immunology and Microbiology 6 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 1%
Other 5 5%
Unknown 16 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 January 2023.
All research outputs
#3,287,152
of 25,743,152 outputs
Outputs from Arthritis Research & Therapy
#678
of 3,412 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,276
of 174,855 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Arthritis Research & Therapy
#3
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,743,152 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,412 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 174,855 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.