You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Timing of vasopressor initiation and mortality in septic shock: a cohort study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Care, May 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/cc13868 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Vance Beck, Dan Chateau, Gregory L Bryson, Amarnath Pisipati, Sergio Zanotti, Joseph E Parrillo, Anand Kumar, The Cooperative Antimicrobial Therapy of Septic Shock (CATSS) Database Research Group |
| Abstract |
Despite recent advances in the management of septic shock, mortality remains unacceptably high. Earlier initiation of key therapies including appropriate antimicrobials and fluid resuscitation appears to reduce the mortality in this condition. This study examined whether early initiation of vasopressor therapy is associated with improved survival in fluid therapy-refractory septic shock. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 44 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 7 | 16% |
| United Kingdom | 7 | 16% |
| United States | 5 | 11% |
| Australia | 3 | 7% |
| Spain | 1 | 2% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 2% |
| Chile | 1 | 2% |
| Greece | 1 | 2% |
| Italy | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 17 | 39% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 29 | 66% |
| Scientists | 6 | 14% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 11% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 223 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 2 | <1% |
| Canada | 2 | <1% |
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| Turkey | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Egypt | 1 | <1% |
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 212 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 35 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 29 | 13% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 25 | 11% |
| Researcher | 23 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 23 | 10% |
| Other | 54 | 24% |
| Unknown | 34 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 139 | 62% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 13 | 6% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 7 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 3% |
| Engineering | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 15 | 7% |
| Unknown | 39 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 30. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 February 2019.
All research outputs
#1,296,334
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#1,100
of 6,554 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,541
of 241,837 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#4
of 137 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,554 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 241,837 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 137 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.