↓ Skip to main content

“Not too far to walk”: the influence of distance on place of delivery in a western Kenya health demographic surveillance system

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Health Services Research, May 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
16 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
34 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
159 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
“Not too far to walk”: the influence of distance on place of delivery in a western Kenya health demographic surveillance system
Published in
BMC Health Services Research, May 2014
DOI 10.1186/1472-6963-14-212
Pubmed ID
Authors

Emily Mwaliko, Raymond Downing, Wendy O’Meara, Dinah Chelagat, Andrew Obala, Timothy Downing, Chrispinus Simiyu, David Odhiambo, Paul Ayuo, Diana Menya, Barasa Khwa-Otsyula

Abstract

Maternal health service coverage in Kenya remains low, especially in rural areas where 63% of women deliver at home, mainly because health facilities are too far away and/or they lack transport. The objectives of the present study were to (1) determine the association between the place of delivery and the distance of a household from the nearest health facility and (2) study the demographic characteristics of households with a delivery within a demographic surveillance system (DSS).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 159 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 158 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 29 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 10%
Student > Postgraduate 15 9%
Researcher 13 8%
Student > Bachelor 12 8%
Other 37 23%
Unknown 37 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 33 21%
Nursing and Health Professions 30 19%
Social Sciences 17 11%
Business, Management and Accounting 8 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 4%
Other 21 13%
Unknown 43 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 March 2021.
All research outputs
#2,411,435
of 23,881,329 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#984
of 7,949 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,703
of 229,461 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#12
of 126 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,881,329 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,949 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 229,461 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 126 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.