↓ Skip to main content

Proteomic analysis of sputum reveals novel biomarkers for various presentations of asthma

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Translational Medicine, August 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
27 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
83 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Proteomic analysis of sputum reveals novel biomarkers for various presentations of asthma
Published in
Journal of Translational Medicine, August 2017
DOI 10.1186/s12967-017-1264-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Chao Cao, Wen Li, Wen Hua, Fugui Yan, Hao Zhang, Huaqiong Huang, Yinghua Ying, Na Li, Fen Lan, Shaobin Wang, Xiao Chen, Jing Li, Jinkai Liu, Tianwen Lai, Zhengqiang Bao, Yuan Cao, Yun Zhao, Gang Huang, Lili Huang, Yaqing Huang, Ping Wu, Chao Peng, Zhihua Chen, Kian Fan Chung, Nanshan Zhong, Songmin Ying, Huahao Shen

Abstract

It is now recognized that asthma can present in different forms. Typically, asthma present with symptoms of wheeze, breathlessness and cough. Atypical forms of asthma such as cough variant asthma (CVA) or chest tightness variant asthma (CTVA) do not wheeze. We hypothesize that these different forms of asthma may have distinctive cellular and molecular features. 30 patients with typical or classical asthma (CA), 27 patients with CVA, 30 patients with CTVA, and 30 healthy control adults were enrolled in this prospective study. We measured serum IgE, lung function, sputum eosinophils, nitric oxide in exhaled breath (FeNO). We performed proteomic analysis of induced-sputum supernatants by mass spectrometry. There were no significant differences in atopy and FEV1 among patients with CA, CVA, and CTVA. Serum IgE, sputum eosinophil percentages, FeNO, anxiety and depression scores were significantly increased in the three presentations of asthmatic patients as compared with healthy controls but there was no difference between the asthmatic groups. Comprehensive mass spectrometric analysis revealed more than a thousand proteins in the sputum from patients with CA, CVA, and CTVA, among which 23 secreted proteins were higher in patients than that in controls. Patients with CA, CVA, or CTVA share common clinical characteristics of eosinophilic airway inflammation. And more importantly, their sputum samples were composed with common factors with minor distinctions. These findings support the concept that these three different presentations of asthma have similar pathogenetic mechanism in terms of an enhanced Th2 associated with eosinophilia. In addition, this study identified a pool of novel biomarkers for diagnosis of asthma and to label its subtypes. Trial registration http://www.chictr.org.cn (ChiCTR-OOC-15006221).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 83 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 83 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 13%
Student > Bachelor 7 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 8%
Student > Master 5 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 5%
Other 11 13%
Unknown 38 46%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 12 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 11 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 6%
Psychology 2 2%
Other 7 8%
Unknown 40 48%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 May 2018.
All research outputs
#13,526,760
of 23,344,526 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Translational Medicine
#1,571
of 4,117 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#156,709
of 318,259 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Translational Medicine
#14
of 48 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,344,526 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,117 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 318,259 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 48 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.