↓ Skip to main content

Trial of Optimal Personalised Care After Treatment for Gynaecological cancer (TOPCAT-G): a study protocol for a randomised feasibility trial

Overview of attention for article published in Pilot and Feasibility Studies, November 2016
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
44 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Trial of Optimal Personalised Care After Treatment for Gynaecological cancer (TOPCAT-G): a study protocol for a randomised feasibility trial
Published in
Pilot and Feasibility Studies, November 2016
DOI 10.1186/s40814-016-0108-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kirstie Pye, Nicola Totton, Nicholas Stuart, Rhiannon Whitaker, Val Morrison, Rhiannon Tudor Edwards, Seow Tien Yeo, Laura J. Timmis, Caryl Butterworth, Liz Hall, Tekendra Rai, Zoe Hoare, Richard D. Neal, Clare Wilkinson, Simon Leeson

Abstract

Gynaecological cancers are diagnosed in over 1000 women in Wales every year. We estimate that this is costing the National Health Service (NHS) in excess of £1 million per annum for routine follow-up appointments alone. Follow-up care is not evidence-based, and there are no definitive guidelines from The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) for the type of follow-up that should be delivered. Standard care is to provide a regular medical review of the patient in a hospital-based outpatient clinic for a minimum of 5 years. This study is to evaluate the feasibility of a proposed alternative where the patients are delivered a specialist nurse-led telephone intervention known as Optimal Personalised Care After Treatment for Gynaecological cancer (OPCAT-G), which comprised of a protocol-based patient education, patient empowerment and structured needs assessment. The study will recruit female patients who have completed treatment for cervical, endometrial, epithelial ovarian or vulval cancer within the previous 3 months in Betsi Cadwaladr University Health Board (BCUHB) in North Wales. Following recruitment, participants will be randomised to one of two arms in the trial (standard care or OPCAT-G intervention). The primary outcomes for the trial are patient recruitment and attrition rates, and the secondary outcomes are quality of life, health status and capability, using the EORTC QLQ-C30, EQ-5D-3L and ICECAP-A measures. Additionally, a client service receipt inventory (CSRI) will be collected in order to pilot an economic evaluation. The results from this feasibility study will be used to inform a fully powered randomised controlled trial to evaluate the difference between standard care and the OPCAT-G intervention. ISRCTN45565436.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 44 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 7 16%
Student > Bachelor 5 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 9%
Researcher 4 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 9%
Other 7 16%
Unknown 13 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 10 23%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 18%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 7%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Other 3 7%
Unknown 17 39%