↓ Skip to main content

Deprivation, clubs and drugs: results of a UK regional population-based cross-sectional study of weight management strategies

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, May 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (57th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
69 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Deprivation, clubs and drugs: results of a UK regional population-based cross-sectional study of weight management strategies
Published in
BMC Public Health, May 2014
DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-14-444
Pubmed ID
Authors

Clare Relton, Jessica Li, Mark Strong, Michelle Holdsworth, Richard Cooper, Mark Green, Paul Bissell

Abstract

Despite rising levels of obesity in England, little is known about slimming club and weight loss drug (medication) use or users. In order to inform future commissioning, we report the prevalence of various weight management strategies and examine the associations between slimming club and medication use and age, gender, deprivation and body mass index.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 69 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
Unknown 68 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 13 19%
Researcher 10 14%
Student > Master 9 13%
Other 6 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 7%
Other 14 20%
Unknown 12 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 11 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 14%
Psychology 7 10%
Social Sciences 6 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 6%
Other 10 14%
Unknown 21 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 April 2015.
All research outputs
#6,374,241
of 23,316,003 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#6,634
of 15,202 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#60,130
of 228,558 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#129
of 301 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,316,003 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,202 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 228,558 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 301 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.