↓ Skip to main content

The contribution of reduction in malaria as a cause of rapid decline of under-five mortality: evidence from the Rufiji Health and Demographic Surveillance System (HDSS) in rural Tanzania

Overview of attention for article published in Malaria Journal, May 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
106 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The contribution of reduction in malaria as a cause of rapid decline of under-five mortality: evidence from the Rufiji Health and Demographic Surveillance System (HDSS) in rural Tanzania
Published in
Malaria Journal, May 2014
DOI 10.1186/1475-2875-13-180
Pubmed ID
Authors

Almamy M Kanté, Rose Nathan, Stéphane Helleringer, Mrema Sigilbert, Francis Levira, Honorati Masanja, Don de Savigny, Salim Abdulla, James F Phillips

Abstract

Under-five mortality has been declining rapidly in a number of sub-Saharan African settings. Malaria-related mortality is known to be a major component of childhood causes of death and malaria remains a major focus of health interventions. The paper explored the contribution of malaria relative to other specific causes of under-five deaths to these trends.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 106 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Burkina Faso 1 <1%
Tanzania, United Republic of 1 <1%
Malawi 1 <1%
Kenya 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 100 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 23 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 17%
Researcher 15 14%
Student > Bachelor 12 11%
Other 6 6%
Other 19 18%
Unknown 13 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 42 40%
Social Sciences 24 23%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 5%
Mathematics 3 3%
Other 8 8%
Unknown 14 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 March 2018.
All research outputs
#5,081,731
of 24,580,204 outputs
Outputs from Malaria Journal
#1,228
of 5,786 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#47,116
of 232,050 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Malaria Journal
#21
of 100 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,580,204 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,786 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 232,050 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 100 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.