You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Longitudinal associations between incident lumbar spine MRI findings and chronic low back pain or radicular symptoms: retrospective analysis of data from the longitudinal assessment of imaging and disability of the back (LAIDBACK)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, May 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2474-15-152 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Pradeep Suri, Edward J Boyko, Jack Goldberg, Christopher W Forsberg, Jeffrey G Jarvik |
| Abstract |
There are few longitudinal cohort studies examining associations between incident MRI findings and incident spine-related symptom outcomes. Prior studies do not discriminate between the two distinct outcomes of low back pain (LBP) and radicular symptoms. To address this gap in the literature, we conducted a secondary analysis of existing data from the Longitudinal Assessment of Imaging and Disability of the Back (LAIDBACK). The purpose of this study was to examine the association of incident lumbar MRI findings with two specific spine-related symptom outcomes: 1) incident chronic bothersome LBP, and 2) incident radicular symptoms such as pain, weakness, or sensation alterations in the lower extremity. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 132 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 25 | 19% |
| United States | 17 | 13% |
| Australia | 8 | 6% |
| Spain | 7 | 5% |
| Saudi Arabia | 7 | 5% |
| Sweden | 6 | 5% |
| Ireland | 4 | 3% |
| Netherlands | 4 | 3% |
| New Zealand | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 10 | 8% |
| Unknown | 40 | 30% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 109 | 83% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 13 | 10% |
| Scientists | 9 | 7% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 139 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 2% |
| United States | 3 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 131 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 23 | 17% |
| Other | 16 | 12% |
| Researcher | 16 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 12 | 9% |
| Other | 30 | 22% |
| Unknown | 28 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 59 | 42% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 22 | 16% |
| Sports and Recreations | 6 | 4% |
| Psychology | 6 | 4% |
| Neuroscience | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 11 | 8% |
| Unknown | 30 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 92. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 February 2023.
All research outputs
#448,683
of 25,027,753 outputs
Outputs from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#46
of 4,354 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,851
of 232,844 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#2
of 102 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,027,753 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,354 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 232,844 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 102 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.