↓ Skip to main content

The history and epidemiology of Middle East respiratory syndrome corona virus

Overview of attention for article published in Multidisciplinary Respiratory Medicine, August 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#19 of 308)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
32 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
74 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
531 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The history and epidemiology of Middle East respiratory syndrome corona virus
Published in
Multidisciplinary Respiratory Medicine, August 2017
DOI 10.1186/s40248-017-0101-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Aisha M. Al-Osail, Marwan J. Al-Wazzah

Abstract

Corona viruses cause common cold, and infections caused by corona viruses are generally self-resolving. During the last 4 years, corona viruses have become the most important viruses worldwide because of the occurrence of several recent deaths caused by corona viruses in Saudi Arabia. Spread of the infection occurred worldwide; however, most cases of mortality have occurred in the Middle East. Owing to the predominance of outbreaks in the Middle Eastern countries, the virus was renamed a Middle East respiratory syndrome corona virus (MERS-CoV) by the Corona virus Study Group. The Center for Diseases Control and Prevention and World Health Organization maintain a website that is updated frequently with new cases of MERS-CoV infection. In this review, we describe the history and epidemiology of this novel virus. Studies of the genetics and molecular mechanisms of this virus are expected to facilitate the development of vaccines in the future.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 32 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 531 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 531 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 96 18%
Student > Master 65 12%
Researcher 34 6%
Other 21 4%
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 4%
Other 82 15%
Unknown 212 40%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 73 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 36 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 32 6%
Immunology and Microbiology 22 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 20 4%
Other 126 24%
Unknown 222 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 34. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 January 2022.
All research outputs
#1,184,317
of 25,639,676 outputs
Outputs from Multidisciplinary Respiratory Medicine
#19
of 308 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,550
of 328,452 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Multidisciplinary Respiratory Medicine
#1
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,639,676 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 308 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 328,452 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them