You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Reconstruction and in vivo analysis of the extinct tbx5 gene from ancient wingless moa (Aves: Dinornithiformes)
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Ecology and Evolution, May 2014
|
DOI | 10.1186/1471-2148-14-75 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Leon Huynen, Takayuki Suzuki, Toshihiko Ogura, Yusuke Watanabe, Craig D Millar, Michael Hofreiter, Craig Smith, Sara Mirmoeini, David M Lambert |
Abstract |
The forelimb-specific gene tbx5 is highly conserved and essential for the development of forelimbs in zebrafish, mice, and humans. Amongst birds, a single order, Dinornithiformes, comprising the extinct wingless moa of New Zealand, are unique in having no skeletal evidence of forelimb-like structures. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 2 | 18% |
United States | 2 | 18% |
Japan | 1 | 9% |
Unknown | 6 | 55% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 7 | 64% |
Scientists | 2 | 18% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 9% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 2 | 6% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 29 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 8 | 25% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 22% |
Student > Bachelor | 5 | 16% |
Student > Master | 2 | 6% |
Professor | 1 | 3% |
Other | 3 | 9% |
Unknown | 6 | 19% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 17 | 53% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 19% |
Environmental Science | 1 | 3% |
Engineering | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 7 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 April 2024.
All research outputs
#1,701,856
of 25,765,370 outputs
Outputs from BMC Ecology and Evolution
#402
of 3,725 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,437
of 242,683 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Ecology and Evolution
#8
of 77 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,765,370 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,725 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 242,683 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 77 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.