You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Recovery from critical illness-induced organ failure: the role of autophagy
|
---|---|
Published in |
Critical Care, August 2017
|
DOI | 10.1186/s13054-017-1786-y |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Jan Gunst |
Abstract |
Autophagy is a catabolic process by which cells can dispose of damaged content and intracellular microorganisms. Recent evidence implicates autophagy as a crucial repair process necessary to recover from critical illness-induced organ failure. Withholding parenteral nutrition in the acute phase of critical illness activates autophagy and enhances recovery. Several registered drugs have autophagy-stimulating properties, but all lack specificity and none has been investigated in critically ill patients for this purpose. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 4 | 25% |
Spain | 1 | 6% |
Argentina | 1 | 6% |
Canada | 1 | 6% |
Malaysia | 1 | 6% |
Germany | 1 | 6% |
Unknown | 7 | 44% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 10 | 63% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 19% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 19% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 46 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Other | 7 | 15% |
Student > Master | 6 | 13% |
Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 9% |
Professor | 3 | 7% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 4% |
Other | 11 | 24% |
Unknown | 13 | 28% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 19 | 41% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 13% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 4% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 4% |
Unspecified | 1 | 2% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 16 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 September 2017.
All research outputs
#3,809,910
of 22,996,001 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#2,746
of 6,087 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#68,413
of 317,751 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#61
of 85 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,996,001 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,087 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 317,751 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 85 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.