↓ Skip to main content

Rest-activity rhythms in small scale homelike care and traditional care for residents with dementia

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Geriatrics, July 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (63rd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
72 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Rest-activity rhythms in small scale homelike care and traditional care for residents with dementia
Published in
BMC Geriatrics, July 2017
DOI 10.1186/s12877-017-0525-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jeroen S. Kok, Ina J. Berg, Gerwin C. G. Blankevoort, Erik J. A. Scherder

Abstract

An enriched environment for residents with dementia may have a positive effect on the rest-activity rhythm. A small scaled homelike special care unit might be such an enriched environment. The present study shows whether the rest-activity rhythm of residents with moderate to severe dementia responds positively to a transfer from a regular Special Care Unit (SCU) to a small scaled homelike SCU. Initially, a group of 145 residents living in a regular SCU participated. Out of this group, 77 residents moved to a small scaled homelike SCU. This group was compared to the group of 68 residents that remained at the regular SCU. Rest-activity rhythm was assessed by means of actigraphy and observation scales before and after relocation. No significant main effects nor significant interaction effects in intradaily and interdaily activity were found for the data of 38 residents in the small scaled homelike SCU and 20 residents of the regular SCU. The effect sizes, however, ranged from small to large. Considering the effect sizes, a new study with a larger number of participants is necessary before firm conclusions can be drawn. Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN11151241 . registration date: 21-06-2017. Retrospectively registered.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 72 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 72 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 11%
Student > Master 8 11%
Researcher 7 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 8%
Student > Postgraduate 3 4%
Other 11 15%
Unknown 29 40%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 10 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 11%
Social Sciences 5 7%
Psychology 4 6%
Sports and Recreations 3 4%
Other 9 13%
Unknown 33 46%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 January 2022.
All research outputs
#6,996,768
of 22,931,367 outputs
Outputs from BMC Geriatrics
#1,681
of 3,210 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#110,613
of 312,967 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Geriatrics
#34
of 58 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,931,367 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,210 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.4. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 312,967 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 58 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.