↓ Skip to main content

A systematic review on improving cognition in schizophrenia: which is the more commonly used type of training, practice or strategy learning?

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Psychiatry, May 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
44 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
132 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A systematic review on improving cognition in schizophrenia: which is the more commonly used type of training, practice or strategy learning?
Published in
BMC Psychiatry, May 2014
DOI 10.1186/1471-244x-14-139
Pubmed ID
Authors

Karine Paquin, Alexa Larouche Wilson, Caroline Cellard, Tania Lecomte, Stéphane Potvin

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 132 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 4 3%
Spain 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 125 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 15%
Researcher 15 11%
Student > Master 15 11%
Student > Bachelor 12 9%
Student > Postgraduate 10 8%
Other 30 23%
Unknown 30 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 46 35%
Medicine and Dentistry 22 17%
Neuroscience 7 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 4%
Social Sciences 3 2%
Other 16 12%
Unknown 33 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 July 2015.
All research outputs
#15,300,431
of 22,755,127 outputs
Outputs from BMC Psychiatry
#3,356
of 4,669 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#133,638
of 227,204 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Psychiatry
#68
of 83 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,755,127 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,669 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.9. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 227,204 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 83 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.