↓ Skip to main content

The use of digit ratios as markers for perinatal androgen action

Overview of attention for article published in Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology, February 2006
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
243 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
183 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The use of digit ratios as markers for perinatal androgen action
Published in
Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology, February 2006
DOI 10.1186/1477-7827-4-10
Pubmed ID
Authors

Matthew H McIntyre

Abstract

Since the ratio of the second-to-fourth finger length was first proposed as a marker for prenatal androgen action in 1998, over 100 studies have been published that have either further tested the association between the digit ratio and prenatal androgens, or employed digit ratios as a marker to investigate the association between prenatal androgens and a variety of outcomes, including behavior, fertility, and disease risks. Despite the clear demand for an adult marker of prenatal androgen action and increased use of digit ratios as such a marker, its validity remains controversial. This review (1) evaluates current evidence for the relationship between digit ratios and prenatal androgens (using experimentation with animal models, amniotic testosterone, and congenital adrenal hyperplasia case-control studies), (2) describes opportunities for future validation tests, and (3) compares the potential advantages and disadvantages of digit ratio measures with more established methods for studying the effects of prenatal androgens.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 183 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 2%
United Kingdom 3 2%
Brazil 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Russia 1 <1%
Poland 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 169 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 36 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 32 17%
Student > Master 23 13%
Student > Bachelor 19 10%
Student > Postgraduate 17 9%
Other 42 23%
Unknown 14 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 49 27%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 39 21%
Medicine and Dentistry 27 15%
Social Sciences 10 5%
Neuroscience 7 4%
Other 21 11%
Unknown 30 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 July 2020.
All research outputs
#6,405,394
of 22,755,127 outputs
Outputs from Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology
#233
of 970 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,793
of 71,575 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology
#2
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,755,127 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 970 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 71,575 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.