↓ Skip to main content

Voluntary undergraduate technical skills training course to prepare students for clerkship assignment: tutees’ and tutors’ perspectives

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Education, April 2014
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
105 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Voluntary undergraduate technical skills training course to prepare students for clerkship assignment: tutees’ and tutors’ perspectives
Published in
BMC Medical Education, April 2014
DOI 10.1186/1472-6920-14-71
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mats Blohm, Markus Krautter, Jan Lauter, Julia Huber, Peter Weyrich, Wolfgang Herzog, Jana Jünger, Christoph Nikendei

Abstract

Skills lab training has become a widespread tool in medical education, and nowadays, skills labs are ubiquitous among medical faculties across the world. An increasingly prevalent didactic approach in skills lab teaching is peer-assisted learning (PAL), which has been shown to be not only effective, but can be considered to be on a par with faculty staff-led training. The aim of the study is to determine whether voluntary preclinical skills teaching by peer tutors is a feasible method for preparing medical students for effective workplace learning in clerkships and to investigate both tutees' and tutors' attitudes towards such an intervention.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 105 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 104 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 16 15%
Researcher 13 12%
Student > Master 11 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 7%
Other 29 28%
Unknown 20 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 47 45%
Social Sciences 11 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 8%
Psychology 5 5%
Arts and Humanities 2 2%
Other 7 7%
Unknown 25 24%