↓ Skip to main content

On the path to 2025: understanding the Alzheimer’s disease continuum

Overview of attention for article published in Alzheimer's Research & Therapy, August 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
6 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
339 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
649 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
On the path to 2025: understanding the Alzheimer’s disease continuum
Published in
Alzheimer's Research & Therapy, August 2017
DOI 10.1186/s13195-017-0283-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Paul S. Aisen, Jeffrey Cummings, Clifford R. Jack, John C. Morris, Reisa Sperling, Lutz Frölich, Roy W. Jones, Sherie A. Dowsett, Brandy R. Matthews, Joel Raskin, Philip Scheltens, Bruno Dubois

Abstract

Basic research advances in recent years have furthered our understanding of the natural history of Alzheimer's disease (AD). It is now recognized that pathophysiological changes begin many years prior to clinical manifestations of disease and the spectrum of AD spans from clinically asymptomatic to severely impaired. Defining AD purely by its clinical presentation is thus artificial and efforts have been made to recognize the disease based on both clinical and biomarker findings. Advances with biomarkers have also prompted a shift in how the disease is considered as a clinico-pathophysiological entity, with an increasing appreciation that AD should not only be viewed with discrete and defined clinical stages, but as a multifaceted process moving along a seamless continuum. Acknowledging this concept is critical to understanding the development process for disease-modifying therapies, and for initiating effective diagnostic and disease management options. In this article, we discuss the concept of a disease continuum from pathophysiological, biomarker, and clinical perspectives, and highlight the importance of considering AD as a continuum rather than discrete stages. While the pathophysiology of AD has still not been elucidated completely, there is ample evidence to support researchers and clinicians embracing the view of a disease continuum in their study, diagnosis, and management of the disease.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 649 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 649 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 91 14%
Student > Master 80 12%
Researcher 65 10%
Student > Bachelor 64 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 31 5%
Other 95 15%
Unknown 223 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 106 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 69 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 45 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 30 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 29 4%
Other 121 19%
Unknown 249 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 January 2024.
All research outputs
#2,580,194
of 25,196,456 outputs
Outputs from Alzheimer's Research & Therapy
#588
of 1,431 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#46,912
of 323,524 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Alzheimer's Research & Therapy
#8
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,196,456 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,431 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 323,524 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.