↓ Skip to main content

Characterisation of COPD heterogeneity in the ECLIPSE cohort

Overview of attention for article published in Respiratory Research, September 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
979 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
613 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Characterisation of COPD heterogeneity in the ECLIPSE cohort
Published in
Respiratory Research, September 2010
DOI 10.1186/1465-9921-11-122
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alvar Agusti, Peter MA Calverley, Bartolome Celli, Harvey O Coxson, Lisa D Edwards, David A Lomas, William MacNee, Bruce E Miller, Steve Rennard, Edwin K Silverman, Ruth Tal-Singer, Emiel Wouters, Julie C Yates, Jørgen Vestbo, the Evaluation of COPD Longitudinally to Identify Predictive Surrogate Endpoints (ECLIPSE) investigators

Abstract

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a complex condition with pulmonary and extra-pulmonary manifestations. This study describes the heterogeneity of COPD in a large and well characterised and controlled COPD cohort (ECLIPSE).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 613 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 4 <1%
India 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Denmark 2 <1%
Russia 2 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Tunisia 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Other 3 <1%
Unknown 594 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 109 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 76 12%
Student > Master 73 12%
Other 59 10%
Student > Bachelor 51 8%
Other 123 20%
Unknown 122 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 269 44%
Nursing and Health Professions 38 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 31 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 29 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 21 3%
Other 84 14%
Unknown 141 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 March 2023.
All research outputs
#2,548,804
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Respiratory Research
#273
of 3,107 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,732
of 109,093 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Respiratory Research
#3
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,107 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 109,093 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.