You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Experience of gratitude, awe and beauty in life among patients with multiple sclerosis and psychiatric disorders
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, April 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1477-7525-12-63 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Arndt Büssing, Anne Gritli Wirth, Franz Reiser, Anne Zahn, Knut Humbroich, Kathrin Gerbershagen, Sebastian Schimrigk, Michael Haupts, Niels Christian Hvidt, Klaus Baumann |
| Abstract |
Feelings of gratitude and awe facilitate perceptions and cognitions that go beyond the focus of illness and include positive aspects of one's personal and interpersonal reality, even in the face of disease. We intended to measure feelings of gratitude, awe, and experiences of beauty in life among patients with multiple sclerosis and psychiatric disorders, particularly with respect to their engagement in specific spiritual/religious practices and their life satisfaction. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 1 | 25% |
| United States | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 101 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 100 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 20 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 14 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 13 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 8% |
| Other | 7 | 7% |
| Other | 16 | 16% |
| Unknown | 23 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 41 | 41% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 11% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 8% |
| Social Sciences | 6 | 6% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 6 | 6% |
| Unknown | 25 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 June 2017.
All research outputs
#16,047,334
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
#1,279
of 2,297 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#132,048
of 241,759 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
#22
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,297 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 241,759 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.