↓ Skip to main content

Web-based therapeutic exercise resource center as a treatment for knee osteoarthritis: a prospective cohort pilot study

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, May 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
43 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
195 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Web-based therapeutic exercise resource center as a treatment for knee osteoarthritis: a prospective cohort pilot study
Published in
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, May 2014
DOI 10.1186/1471-2474-15-158
Pubmed ID
Authors

M Alison Brooks, John E Beaulieu, Herbert H Severson, Christa M Wille, David Cooper, Jeff M Gau, Bryan C Heiderscheit

Abstract

Although beneficial effects of exercise in the management of knee osteoarthritis (OA) have been established, only 14 -18% of patients with knee OA receive an exercise from their primary care provider. Patients with knee OA cite lack of physician exercise advice as a major reason why they do not exercise to improve their condition. The purpose of this pilot study was to investigate use of a web-based Therapeutic Exercise Resource Center (TERC) as a tool to prescribe strength, flexibility and aerobic exercise as part of knee OA treatment. It was hypothesized that significant change in clinical outcome scores would result from patients' use of the TERC.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 195 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Unknown 192 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 26 13%
Student > Master 22 11%
Student > Bachelor 22 11%
Researcher 16 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 6%
Other 40 21%
Unknown 57 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 50 26%
Nursing and Health Professions 25 13%
Sports and Recreations 12 6%
Psychology 8 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 3%
Other 30 15%
Unknown 64 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 May 2014.
All research outputs
#6,222,232
of 22,756,196 outputs
Outputs from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#1,177
of 4,037 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#59,561
of 227,399 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#18
of 96 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,756,196 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,037 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 227,399 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 96 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.