↓ Skip to main content

Patient freedom to choose a weight loss diet in the treatment of overweight and obesity: a randomized dietary intervention in type 2 diabetes and pre-diabetes

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, May 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
9 X users
patent
1 patent
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
187 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Patient freedom to choose a weight loss diet in the treatment of overweight and obesity: a randomized dietary intervention in type 2 diabetes and pre-diabetes
Published in
International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, May 2014
DOI 10.1186/1479-5868-11-64
Pubmed ID
Authors

Leah T Coles, Elly A Fletcher, Claire E Galbraith, Peter M Clifton

Abstract

Offering the overweight or obese patient the option of choosing from a selection of weight loss diets has not been investigated in type 2 diabetes. The aim of the study was to investigate if the option to choose from, and interchange between a selection of diets ("Choice"), as opposed to being prescribed one set diet ("No Choice"), improves drop out rates and leads to improved weight loss and cardio-metabolic outcomes.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 187 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Mexico 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Unknown 185 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 36 19%
Student > Bachelor 33 18%
Researcher 20 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 4%
Other 27 14%
Unknown 50 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 47 25%
Nursing and Health Professions 32 17%
Psychology 11 6%
Social Sciences 10 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 4%
Other 21 11%
Unknown 58 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 34. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 April 2023.
All research outputs
#1,165,585
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
#392
of 2,116 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,228
of 241,956 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
#6
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,116 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 241,956 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.