↓ Skip to main content
Embed badge What is this page?

Comparison of enzymatic reactivity of corn stover solids prepared by dilute acid, AFEX™, and ionic liquid pretreatments

Overview of attention for article published in Biotechnology for Biofuels, May 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
70 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
109 Mendeley

What is this page?

Summary Twitter Dimensions citations
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Comparison of enzymatic reactivity of corn stover solids prepared by dilute acid, AFEX™, and ionic liquid pretreatments
Published in
Biotechnology for Biofuels, May 2014
DOI 10.1186/1754-6834-7-71
Pubmed ID
24910713
Authors

Xiadi Gao, Rajeev Kumar, Seema Singh, Blake A Simmons, Venkatesh Balan, Bruce E Dale, Charles E Wyman

Abstract

Pretreatment is essential to realize high product yields from biological conversion of naturally recalcitrant cellulosic biomass, with thermochemical pretreatments often favored for cost and performance. In this study, enzymatic digestion of solids from dilute sulfuric acid (DA), ammonia fiber expansion (AFEX™), and ionic liquid (IL) thermochemical pretreatments of corn stover were followed over time for the same range of total enzyme protein loadings to provide comparative data on glucose and xylose yields of monomers and oligomers from the pretreated solids. The composition of pretreated solids and enzyme adsorption on each substrate were also measured to determine. The extent glucose release could be related to these features.

View on publisher site

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 109 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 2%
Indonesia 1 <1%
Iran, Islamic Republic of 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 103 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 22 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 19%
Student > Master 21 19%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 9%
Student > Bachelor 6 6%
Other 15 14%
Unknown 14 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 24 22%
Engineering 17 16%
Chemical Engineering 14 13%
Chemistry 13 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 10%
Other 12 11%
Unknown 18 17%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 September 2014.
All research outputs
#8,934,852
of 14,259,883 outputs
Outputs from Biotechnology for Biofuels
#617
of 1,100 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#97,528
of 188,866 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biotechnology for Biofuels
#15
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,259,883 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,100 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 188,866 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.

This page is provided by Altmetric.