↓ Skip to main content

Recurrent erysipelas - risk factors and clinical presentation

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Infectious Diseases, May 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
60 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
75 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Recurrent erysipelas - risk factors and clinical presentation
Published in
BMC Infectious Diseases, May 2014
DOI 10.1186/1471-2334-14-270
Pubmed ID
Authors

Malin Inghammar, Magnus Rasmussen, Adam Linder

Abstract

Erysipelas is a common infection that often recurs, but the impact of specific risk factors for reoccurrence remains elusive. In the present study we aimed at clarifying predisposing conditions for reoccurrence.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 75 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 1%
Philippines 1 1%
Unknown 73 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 11 15%
Student > Master 10 13%
Researcher 8 11%
Student > Bachelor 7 9%
Student > Postgraduate 6 8%
Other 17 23%
Unknown 16 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 47 63%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 1%
Other 3 4%
Unknown 17 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 April 2023.
All research outputs
#6,675,049
of 23,575,882 outputs
Outputs from BMC Infectious Diseases
#2,082
of 7,861 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#62,594
of 228,491 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Infectious Diseases
#42
of 153 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,575,882 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,861 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 228,491 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 153 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.